Skip to main content
Tag

urticaria

Cholinergic Urticaria: Subtype Classification and Clinical Approach

By New, Selected articles

Atsushi Fukunaga

Am J Clin Dermatol . 2022 Sep 15;1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00728-6. Online ahead of print.

Cholinergic urticaria is a subtype of chronic inducible urticaria with painful wheals with surrounding erythema which occur after sweating. The objective of this review was to analyze different subtypes of cholinergic urticaria and its correlation to anhidrosis.

Recent publications were reviewed to update evidence on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic approaches, physiopathology subtype classification and therapeutic approaches of cholinergic urticaria.

When examining patients who present with symptoms similar to cholinergic urticaria, it is important to run a differential diagnosis to screen for a sweating dysfunction.

There are different mechanisms that contribute to the development of cholinergic urticaria, namely histamine, sweat allergy, cholinergic-related substances, poral occlusion and hypohidrosis/anhidrosis. These mechanisms are important to focus on the subtypes of cholinergic urticaria so that it can be managed and treated adequately, given the fact that this condition does not present in a homogeneous way.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

An evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria

By New, Selected articles

Sinem Ayse Ornek

Int Immunopharmacol . 2022 Sep 15;112:109198. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109198. Online ahead of print.

Chronic urticaria is a common condition characterized by recurrent pruritic wheals and/or angioedema for more than 6 weeks. As a first-line treatment, guidelines recommend standard doses of antihistamines and as second-line an increase in antihistamines’ dose. There is a lack of studies on remission rates with first and second-line treatments as well as indicators of antihistamine response. The aim of this study was to assess response rates to chronic urticaria first and second-line treatments and to identify characteristics of the patients that can help estimate treatment outcomes.

Different types of urticaria outcomes were retrospectively analyzed: 556 chronic spontaneous urticaria and 101 chronic inducible urticaria cases on at least 3 months of follow-up data.

Results have shown that a standard dose of 2nd generation antihistamines was proving efficacy in 43% of the patients. An additional 28.8% of patients were in remission with 2nd line treatments. Increasing antihistamine dose, combining two different 2nd generation antihistamines, combining 1st and 2nd generation antihistamines or combining leukotriene receptor antagonist offered remission in 38.3 %, 35.8 %, 37.5% and 25 % of patients who were given these treatments, respectively.

In conclusion, it is important to have a stepwise approach to managing chronic urticaria because the number of patients who respond to treatment increases with each step.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Acute Urticaria and Anaphylaxis: Differences and Similarities in Clinical Management

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Ensina LF, Min TK, Félix MMR, et al.

Front Allergy. 2022 Apr 15;3:840999. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.840999. eCollection 2022.

Acute urticaria is common and presents with wheals and/or angioedema. These symptoms are also frequent in anaphylaxis, a life-threatening reaction that must be immediately treated. In both conditions, mast cells have a central role in their mechanism of action. Although these similarities, the diagnostic approach is usually different, as it depends on the suspicious triggers, age of the patient and region where they’re based.

Anaphylaxis must be treated with adrenaline as first-line while urticaria flares can be treated with H1-antihistamines are the first choice.

The best approach to prevent anaphylaxis or acute urticaria episodes is to avoid the trigger that is responsible for the reaction, having in consideration that a solution may be desensitization to drugs and foods in selected patients to improve their quality of life.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

A Comparative, Three-Arm, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Bilastine vs Fexofenadine vs Levocetirizine

By Articles about Bilastine, Publicaciones sobre Bilastina

Shah B, Dhoot D, Choudhary A, Jangid N, Mistry D, Shah S, Kamat S, Barkate H

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Feb 18;15:261-270. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S350122.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin condition associated with angioedema, wheals, or both. Although second-generation antihistamines (SGAH) are first-line drugs in CSU, half of the patients do not respond to them. Guidelines recommendation for these patients is to up-dose SGAH or combine different antihistamines. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and tolerability of up-dosing of bilastine and fexofenadine up to two times and combination of non-sedating second-generation antihistamines; levocetirizine and first-generation antihistamine; and hydroxyzine in patients with CSU.

This was a comparative, three-arm study, which randomized CSU participants to receive standard dose of either bilastine, fexofenadine, or levocetirizine for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks of treatment, non-responders received double dose of either bilastine or fexofenadine, while hydroxyzine 25 mg once daily was added in the levocetirizine group. Participants were assessed for better outcomes in CSU, quality of life, and somnolence.

The study included 110 participants with CSU. At the end of 4 weeks, 33/39, 26/35, and 22/36 patients in the bilastine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine groups indicated improvement in urticaria symptoms. At week 2, the urticaria activity score improvement showed no statistical difference between any of the groups; however, at week 4, there was a statistical difference between the bilastine and levocetirizine groups (p<0.05). Somnolence was significantly lower in the bilastine group (p<0.05). Bilastine was statistically significant (p<0.05) in the improvement of quality of life as compared to both groups. There was no report of major adverse events during the study period; however, bilastine was related to significantly lower levels of adverse events compared to levocetirizine (p<0.05).

In conclusion, a two-fold up-dosing of bilastine improves CSU symptoms with no changes in safety as compared to two-fold up-dosing of fexofenadine and combination of first- and second-generation antihistamines.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Experience with bilastine in the management of urticaria: Original Real-world cases of Bilastine In Treatment (ORBIT) in Asia

By Articles about Bilastine, Publicaciones sobre Bilastina

Cheong WK, Chan AWM, Ch’ng CC, Chung WH, Gabriel MT, Godse K, Mitthamsiri W, Nguyen HT, Tiongco-Recto M, Nagrale D

Drugs Context. 2022 Mar 15;11:2021-12-2. doi: 10.7573/dic.2021-12-2. PMID: 35371270; PMCID: PMC8932249

People with urticaria have a compromised quality of life and sleep, and school/work due to its incapacitating condition. It presents with red and itchy rash with characteristic wheals, and/or angioedema. Current guidelines recommend second generation H1-antihistamine as first-line treatment of urticaria. Bilastine is a second-generation H1-antihistamine indicated in children aged ≥6 years and adults (Europe) for the symptomatic treatment of urticaria and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis. It has a well-documented efficacy and safety profile, with a rapid onset and a prolonged duration of action and a low sedative potential.

The objective of the Original Real-world cases of Bilastine In Treatment (ORBIT) study was to evaluate real-world cases published from the Asia-Pacific region in adults and children using bilastine for the long-term management of urticaria.

Eight cases diagnosed and classified according to international guidelines as chronic spontaneous urticaria or inducible urticaria were presented:

  • Case 1: 35-year-old man complaining of an itchy skin rash for the previous 6 months
  • Case 2: 10-year-old boy who developed recurrent hives over the past 3-4 years
  • Case 3: 54-year-old woman with poorly controlled chronic urticaria and intolerance to sedating antihistamines
  • Case 4: 33-year-old woman with cholinergic urticaria
  • Case 5: 20-year-old woman with intensely itchy rash
  • Case 6: 61-year-old woman with atopic (allergic rhinitis) with new-onset urticaria
  • Case 7: An elderly man with recalcitrant CSU unresponsive to second-generation antihistamines
  • Case 8: Chronic rash in an elderly man with multiple comorbidities

Although this was a small and diverse group of patients with urticaria considered difficult to treat, the administration of bilastine as per the approved label was well tolerated and effective in the long-term management of urticaria.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Clinical and histological characteristics during chronic urticaria with dermal neutrophilic infiltrate: Proposal of a diagnostic score

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

A Brehon, P Moguelet, V Seta, E Amsler, A Fajac, A Barbaud, A Soria, JB Monfort

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol . 2021 Nov 6. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17788. Online ahead of print.

There are some arguments on whether neutrophilic urticaria (NU) is distinct from chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), although with no consensus. This study aimed to compare clinical, biological, and histological characteristics and therapeutic responses between NU and CSU.

This was an observational, retrospective study that included adults with chronic urticarial rash who had undergone a skin biopsy. One dermatologist and one cytopathologist blindly and independently reviewed the biopsies [cytology counting technique for a precise proportion of neutrophilic/eosinophilic polynuclear cells (PNN/PNEo)]. NU was defined by an inflammatory dermal infiltrate composed of at least 60% PNN, without leukocytoclasia/vasculitis.

Forty-four patients were included, and their biopsies were classified into two groups: NU (n=28) and CSU (n=16). From the bibliography, there are no characteristics related to PNN at histology, but an increase in erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the NU group (p=0.03). Colchicine also showed to be more effective in cases of significant neutrophilic infiltrate: 42.85% effectiveness in NU group versus 6.25% in CSU group.

Two other findings were a statistically associated relation with neutrophilic venulitis (p=0.04) (corresponding to an intraparietal aggregation of PNN without vasculitis) and a basophilic interstitial flame figure corresponding to degranulation of the PNN cytoplasm and exclusively associated with NU (p=0.04).

A diagnostic score was established using strict quantitative histological criteria (intensity of neutrophilic infiltrate, the existence of neutrophilic venulitis, basophilic flame figures, and intense leukocytoclasia), which allows the classification of urticarial eruptions into NU or UCS.

This score will allow diagnosis and homogenization of NU patients (it correctly classified 40 of the 44 patients from the study).

In conclusion, NU is an independent entity as some histological images were significantly (neutrophilic venulitis) or exclusively (basophilic flame figure) associated with an intense neutrophilic infiltrate. A prospective study is needed to validate this new score.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

What Basophil Testing Tells Us About CSU Patients – Results of the CORSA Study

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

João Marcelino, et al.

Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 28;12:742470. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742470. eCollection 2021

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common condition in adults and children, impacting the quality of life. Recent studies characterized chronic spontaneous urticaria as an autoantibody-driven condition, with mast cells and basophils being activated through two distinct pathways: type I autoimmune CSU, where IgE autoantibodies are cross-linked by self-antigens; and type IIb autoimmune CSU, where IgG and IgM autoantibodies are directed against IgE receptors on the surface of mast cells and basophils. Basophil testing is the most effective way to diagnose type IIb autoimmune CSU: a positive basophil test correlates to long disease duration, higher disease activity, poor response to antihistamines and omalizumab, and a better response to cyclosporine and fenebrutinib.

The objective of this study was to identify features of basophil test-positive patients.

This was a cross-sectional study that included 85 participants with CSU. They were tested for basophils with the basophil-activation test (BAT), the basophil histamine release assay (BHRA), and data were statistically analyzed.

Of all the participants, 44% tested positive with the BAST, and 28% tested positive with BHRA. These participants had higher activity and impact of disease, less disease control, and lower total serum IgE. In contrast, they had a higher rate of positive autologous serum skin test (ASST), angioedema, nocturnal symptoms, symptoms more than five days/week, and thyroid autoantibodies. The ASST was a good predictor of a positive basophil test when combined with angioedema, thyroid autoantibodies, and low IgE.

This study showed that a positive basophil test is related to known characteristics of type II autoimmune CSU, allowing a better approach to these patients’ condition management.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Prevalence, Management, and Anaphylaxis Risk of Cold Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Connor Prosty, Sofianne Gabrielli, Michelle Le, Luis F. Ensina, Xun Zhang, Elena Netchiporouk and Moshe Ben-Shoshan.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract . 2021 Oct 18;S2213-2198(21)01129-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.012. Online ahead of print.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria can be caused by specific triggers, namely cold, exercise or heat. Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) can coexist with chronic spontaneous urticaria and is defined as a particular trigger that provokes the symptoms. Cold inducible urticaria is one example of physical urticaria caused by exposure to cold air, liquids, or objects and is associated with significant morbidity and risk for anaphylaxis.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cold urticaria among cases of chronic urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria, evaluate its management, and determine the rate of associate anaphylaxis.

The investigators did bibliographic research in PubMed and EMBASE for papers on cold urticaria and/or chronic inducible urticaria in the past ten years. An analysis was made to determine the prevalence of cold urticaria among CIndU and chronic urticaria cases, its management with H1-antihistamines and omalizumab, and the rate of associated anaphylaxis.

The research identified 22 studies, of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of cold urticaria among patients with chronic urticaria and CIndU was, respectively, 7.62% [CI95%; 3.45%-15.99%; I2=98%] and 26.10% [CI95%; 14.17%-43.05%; I2=97%]. 95.67% of the cases of cold urticaria were managed by H1-antihistamines [CI95%; 92.47%-97.54%; I2=38%], and by omalizumab in 5.85% of the cases [CI95%; 2.55%-13.22%; I2=83%]. The pooled prevalence of anaphylaxis was 21.49% [CI95%; 15.79%-28.54%; I2=69%].

In conclusion, cold urticaria is common in cases of chronic urticaria and CIndU and frequently triggers anaphylaxis. H1-antihistamines are commonly used for its management, followed by omalizumab.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Lachnospira is a signature of antihistamine efficacy in chronic spontaneous urticaria

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Liu, R., Peng, C., Jing, D., Xiao, Y., Zhu, W., Zhao, S., Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Li, J.

Exp Dermatol. 2021 Sep 24. doi: 10.1111/exd.14460. Online ahead of print.

Chronic urticaria is a condition driven by mast cells, with an average lifetime prevalence of 1.4%. Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a common type of chronic urticaria that impacts quality of life and has a high economic and social burden. Chronic spontaneous urticaria is treated with oral second-generation antihistamines, however only half of the patients respond to up to quadruple doses of these antihistamines. It is known that gut microbiota can affect their efficacy. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between gut microbiota and the efficacy of antihistamines in people with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

The gut microbiota of fecal samples from 15 responders to antihistamine monotherapy and 15 non-responders was assessed by 16S rDNA sequencing, and the differential bacterial species between them were confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Samples from 30 responders and 30 non-responders were used to confirm the differential bacterial species by qPCR.

The main difference between responders and non-responders was the presence of Lachnospiraceae and its subordinate taxa. The quantity of Lachnospira was higher in responders than non-responders.

In conclusion, the presence of Lachnospira has shown to have a moderate diagnostic value in assessing the efficacy of chronic urticaria with antihistamines.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

The International EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI Guideline for the Definition, Classification, Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, et al.

Allergy . 2021 Sep 18. doi: 10.1111/all.15090. Online ahead of print.

Urticaria is a mast-cell-driven condition with symptoms such as wheals, angioedema, or both. Chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria reduce the quality of life, affecting performance at school and work.

This document is an update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria, from a consensus conference held on the 3rd of December of 2020. It covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.

The objective of this guideline is to facilitate a definition and classification of urticaria, helping with data interpretation from different centers and areas of the world.

The table below summarizes the guideline.

How should urticaria be classified?

We recommend that urticaria is classified based on its duration as acute (<= 6 weeks) or chronic (> 6 weeks).

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

We recommend that urticaria is classified as spontaneous (no definite eliciting factor involved) or inducible (specific definite factor involved).

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should we maintain the current guideline classification of chronic urticaria?

We recommend that the current guideline classification of chronic urticaria should be maintained.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should routine diagnostic measures be performed in acute urticaria?

We recommend against any routine diagnostic measures in acute spontaneous urticaria.

↓ ↓

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should differential diagnoses be considered in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria?

We recommend that differential diagnoses be considered in all patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of chronic urticaria based on the guideline algorithm.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

What routine diagnostic measures should be performed in chronic spontaneous urticaria?

We recommend limited investigations. Basic tests include differential blood count, CRP and/or ESR, and in specialized care total IgE and IgG anti-TPO, and more biomarkers as appropriate.

We recommend performing further diagnostic measures based on the patient history and examination, especially in patients with long standing and/or uncontrolled disease.

↑ ↑­­

Consensus**

Expert consensus

Should routine diagnostic measures be performed in inducible urticaria?

We recommend using provocation testing to diagnose chronic inducible urticaria.

We recommend using provocation threshold measurements and the UCT to measure disease activity and control in patients with chronic inducible urticaria, respectively.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should patients with chronic urticaria be assessed for disease activity, impact, and control?

We recommend that patients with CU be assessed for disease activity, impact, and control at every visit.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Which instruments should be used to assess and monitor disease activity in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients?

We recommend the use of the urticaria activity score, UAS7, and/or of the angioedema activity score, AAS, for assessing disease activity in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Which instruments should be used to assess and monitor quality of life impairment in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients?

We recommend the use of the chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire, CU-Q2oL, and the angioedema quality of life questionnaire, AE-QoL, for assessing quality of life impairment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Which instruments should be used to assess and monitor disease control in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients?

We recommend the use of the urticaria control test, UCT, and/or the angioedema control test, AECT, for assessing disease control in patients with CSU.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should treatment aim at complete symptom control in urticaria?

We recommend aiming at complete symptom control in urticaria, considering as much as possible the safety and the quality of life of each individual patient.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria be advised to discontinue medication that is suspected to worsen the disease?

We recommend advising patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria to discontinue medication that is suspected to worsen the disease, e.g. NSAIDs.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should modern 2nd generation H1-antihistamines be used as first-line treatment of urticaria?

We recommend a 2nd generation H1-antihistamine as first-line treatment for all types of urticaria.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Is an increase in the dose to up to four-fold of modern 2nd generation H1-antihistamines useful and to be preferred over other treatments in urticaria?

We recommend updosing of a 2nd generation H1-antihistamine up to 4-fold in patients with chronic urticaria unresponsive to a standard-dosed 2nd generation H1-antihistamines as second line treatment before other treatments are considered.

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Should modern 2nd generation H1-antihistamines be taken regularly or as needed?

We suggest 2nd generation H1-antihistamines to be taken regularly for the treatment of patients with chronic urticaria.

­↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Should different 2nd generation H1-antihistamines be used at the same time?

We suggest against using different H1-antihistamines at the same time.

Consensus***

Evidence and consensus-based

If there is no improvement, should higher than fourfold doses of 2nd generation H1-antihistamines be used?

We recommend against using higher than 4-fold standard dosed H1-antihistamines in chronic urticaria

 ↓ ↓

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Is omalizumab useful as add-on treatment in patients unresponsive to high doses of H1-antihistamines?

We recommend adding on omalizumab* for the treatment of patients with CU unresponsive to high dose 2nd generation H1-antihistamines.

*currently licensed for chronic spontaneous urticaria

­­↑ ↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Is ciclosporin useful as add-on treatment in patients unresponsive to high doses of H1-antihistamine?

We suggest using ciclosporin for the treatment of patients with CU unresponsive to high dose of 2nd generation H1-antihistamine and omalizumab.

­↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Should oral corticosteroids be used as add-on treatment in the treatment of urticaria?

We recommend against the long-term use of systemic glucocorticosteroids in CU.

↓ ↓

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

We suggest considering a short course of rescue systemic glucocorticosteroids in patients with an acute exacerbation of CU.

­ ↑

Strong consensus*

Evidence and consensus-based

Are H2-antihistamines useful as add-on treatment in patients unresponsive to low or high doses of H1-antihistamines?

We cannot make a recommendation for or against the combined use of H1- and H2-antihistamines in patients with chronic urticaria.

0

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Could any other treatment options be recommended for the treatment of urticaria?

We cannot make a recommendation with respect to further treatment options as standard therapies, but these may be considered in special cases, which also include those where financial or legal limitations for the recommended algorithm treatment exist.

0

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should the same treatment algorithm be used in children?
We suggest using the same treatment algorithm with caution (e.g. weight adjusted dosage) in children with chronic urticaria

­ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

Should the same treatment algorithm be used in pregnant women and during lactation?
We suggest using the same treatment algorithm with caution both in pregnant and lactating women after risk-benefit assessment. Drugs contraindicated or not suitable in pregnancy should not be used

­ ↑

Strong consensus*

Expert consensus

*≥90% agreement

**>75% agreement

***≥70% agreement

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Predictive features associated with chronic spontaneous urticaria recurrence

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Elias Toubi, Zahava Vadasz

J Dermatol . 2021 Sep 14. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16119. Online ahead of print.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria is an autoimmune condition for, at least, 50% of the cases, and sometimes it is associated with other autoimmune diseases such as thyroid autoimmunity and systemic lupus erythematosus. They have an increased prevalence of autoreactive T-cell responses to FceRI and serum anti-thyroid antibodies. There are still a lot of unclear aspects to be determined, namely how long CSU will last. Most patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria are concerned about the probability of recurrence and wish for the existence of clinical or laboratory markers. The aim of this study was to understand the prevalence and characteristics of the recurrence of chronic spontaneous urticaria to prevent stressful comorbidities.

The study included 180 regular patients from the local registry. Chronic spontaneous urticaria lasted more than 5 years in 47 (26%) patients and was resolved during the first year in 23 (13%) patients. 21% of the patients reported recurrence of chronic spontaneous urticaria after a full remission between 1 and 10 years (mean 2.9 years).

In the search for predictive clinical or laboratory markers, the main differences found are registered in the table below.

Recurrent urticaria

General urticaria

P value

Bronchial asthma

10/25 (40%) 45/180 (25%)

p=0.049

Total immunoglobulin E

10/25 (40%) 34/150 (23%)

p=0.04

Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies

11/25 (44%) 32/160 (20%)

p=0.003

In conclusion, the prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria after a full remission is significantly higher in patients with bronchial asthma, increased levels of total IgE and autoimmunity. More studies are needed to support these findings.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria detection with IgG anti-TPO and total IgE

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Pavel Kolkhir, Elena Kovalkova, Anton Chernov, Inna Danilycheva, Karoline Krause, Merle Sauer, Andrey Shulzhenko, Daria Fomina, Marcus Maurer

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract . 2021 Aug 4;S2213-2198(21)00884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.043. Online ahead of print.

Common spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin condition driven by mast cells and characterized by the development of wheals, angioedema, or both for more than six weeks. Recently, studies have demonstrated the existence of two endotypes on the pathogenesis of CSU: type I (“autoallergic”) and type IIb autoimmune CSU.

Type IIb autoimmune CSU (aiCSU) is related to IgG, IgM, and IgA autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor, FcɛRIα, activating skin mast cells. At least 8% of the CSU cases are aiCSU and represent a high disease burden (high disease activity, high rates of autoimmune comorbidity, and inadequate response to treatment). aiCSU can be challenging to diagnose because the existing tests (autologous serum skin test (ASST), autoantibody immunoassays, and basophil testing) are not usually available and have limitations. Also, aiCSU responds poorly to treatment.

This study aimed to evaluate how high anti-thyroid peroxidase (aTPO) and low IgE relate to aiCSU and treatment response.

A total of 1120 patient records were analyzed for demographic, clinical, laboratory parameters and treatment responses. Total IgE and aTPO were measured, and four markers were analyzed (ASST, basophil activation test (BAT), eosinophil, and basophil counts).

One of ten patients (n=123) had both high aTPO and low IgE, which was linked to higher age at CSU onset, female, angioedema, and shorter CSU duration. It was also related to positivity to aiCSU markers. A positive BAT was present in 44% of the patients with high aTPO and low IgE. These patients had low response rates to antihistamine treatment compared to the remaining patients.

In conclusion, a high aTPO and low IgE may constitute a valuable biomarker for diagnosing aiCSU in daily clinical practice.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

The challenges of chronic urticaria part 2: Pharmacological treatment, chronic inducible urticaria, urticaria in special situations

By New, Selected articles

Mario Sanchez-Borges, Ignacio J. Ansotegui, Ilaria Baiardini, Jonathan Bernstein, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Motohiro Ebisawa, Maximiliano Gomez, Sandra Nora Gonzalez-Diaz, Bryan Martin, Mario Morais-Almeida and Jose Antonio Ortega Martell

World Allergy Organ J . 2021 Jun 3;14(6):100546. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100546. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria consists in the occurrence of wheals, angioedema, or both more than 6 weeks, and 1-2% of the population is affected. It is more prevalent in women and frequently compromises quality of life and the costs for national health systems can be considerable.

The World Allergy Organization (WAO) has reviewed a position paper published in 2012 regarding diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Since then, there have been advances in the knowledge of urticaria mechanism of action, and new treatments (biologics) have been released for severe refractory disease.

This is the second part of an update from the WAO, which intention is to provide an updated guidance for urticaria, especially in special situations such as childhood and pregnancy.

Second generation H1 antihistamines are recommended in major guidelines as the first line treatment for urticaria, as they are effective and safe. Some guidelines include first generation antihistamines for non responders. The dose can also be increased up to 4 times to improve efficacy (and without compromising safety). Combination of antihistamines does not seem to induce better effects, and patients who are refractory to antihistamines are candidates to omalizumab or cyclosporin-A. Omalizumab is the only biological approved for the treatment of antihistamine-refractory patients with moderate to severe urticaria. Cyclosporin-A is an immunosuppressing drug that inhibits T helper cells by blocking the production of inflammatory cytokines.

Special conditions associated with urticaria include autoinflammatory syndromes and various forms of urticarial vasculitis, which are treated with second generation antihistamines and systemic glucocorticoids, and alternatively immunomodulators and immunosuppressors.

 

Specialists are recommended to follow the guidelines, use validated PRO instruments and use effective and safe medications.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

The challenges of chronic urticaria part 1: Epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, comorbidities, quality of life, and management

By Artículos seleccionados, Selected articles

Mario Sanchez-Borges, Ignacio J. Ansotegui, Ilaria Baiardini, Jonathan Bernstein, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Motohiro Ebisawa, Maximiliano Gomez, Sandra Nora Gonzalez-Diaz, Bryan Martin, Mario Morais-Almeida and Jose Antonio Ortega Martell World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Jun 1;14(6):100533. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100533. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria consists in the occurrence of wheals, angioedema, or both more than 6 weeks, and 1-2% of the population is affected. It is more prevalent in women and frequently compromises quality of life and the costs for national health systems can be considerable.

The World Allergy Organization (WAO) has reviewed a position paper published in 2012 regarding diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Since then, there have been advances in the knowledge of urticaria mechanism of action, and new treatments (biologics) have been released for severe refractory disease. Urticaria pathological mechanisms include different cell types, mainly mast cells, basophils, eosinophils, T and B lymphocytes and epithelial and endothelial cells. The dysregulation of intracellular signaling pathways and autoimmune mechanisms have an important role in the activation of mast cells/basophils, which leads to the release of inflammatory mediators resulting in wheals and angioedema.

This is the first part of an update from the WAO, which intention is to provide an updated guidance for urticaria.

Biomarkers have been identified for the prognosis of chronic urticaria (total IgE, CRP, ASST, Anti-TPO, IL-17, IL-31, IL-33) and the assessment of the response of different therapies. Specialists are recommended to follow the guidelines, use validated PRO instruments and use effective and safe medications.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Real-Life Experience of Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Refractory Cases of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and its Effect on the Quality of Life of Patients

By Articles about Bilastine

Abhishek De, Kiran Godse, Dhiraj Dhoot, and Aarti Sarda

Indian J Dermatol . Mar-Apr 2021;66(2):159-164. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_771_20.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a skin condition with wheals and angioedema, for more than six weeks. Second-generation H1-antihistamines are the first line treatment for these allergic conditions, namely bilastine. The aim of this study was to assess long-term efficacy and tolerability of bilastine in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in India.

This was a retrospective analysis that identified patients with urticaria who were prescribe bilastine between May, 1, 2019 to March, 20, 2020 from analysis of electronic medical records. Patients with unsatisfactory response to previous treatment were also included. Unsatisfactory treatment was assessed as per Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7). The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by revising their UAS7 score ate weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. DLQI was also evaluated and compared at baseline and week 24.

The study included 49 patients. At 24 weeks, 51% of them had achieved treatment response (UAS = 0) and the remaining 49% had a well-controlled urticaria (UAS <6). At 24 weeks, mean UAS7 was statistically significant compared to baseline values (1,35 ± 1,61 vs. 20,2 ± 5,73), and mean DLQI score also decreased to 1,63 ± 1,18, compared to 8,39 ± 2,49 at baseline.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that patients who usually had an inadequate response with commonly used antihistamines, when switched to bilastine had their quality of life and symptoms improved.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Close Menu

La información que está a punto de visualizar está dirigida únicamente a los profesionales sanitarios aptos para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos. La correcta utilización de su contenido requiere de formación como profesional sanitario.

Debe hacer clic en Aceptar para confirmar que es usted profesional de la salud y continuar con la navegación.

ACEPTAR