Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

February 2019

Apnea del sueño y sueño

Association of allergic rhinitis with obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis

By Selected articles
Cao Y, Wu S, Zhang L, Yang Y, Cao S, Li Q.

The prevalence of Allergic Rhinitis in OSA/SDB is considerably high and children with SDB suffering from a higher incidence of AR than non-SDB. OSA adults accompanied with AR do not have any influences on sleep parameters.
Allergic rhinitis (AR); obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Bilastina y pacientes japoneses

Efficacy and safety of bilastine in Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study

By Articles about Bilastine
Okubo K, Gotoh M, Asako M, Nomura Y, Togawa M, Saito A, Honda T, Ohashi Y.

After 2-week treatment period, bilastine 20 mg once daily was effective and tolerable in Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and exhibited a rapid onset of action.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Estudio bilastina en niños de 2 a 12 años

Safety and tolerability of bilastine 10 mg administered for 12 weeks in children with allergic diseases

By Articles about Bilastine
Novák Z, Yáñez A, Kiss I, Kuna P, Tortajada-Girbés M, Valiente R; “Bilastine Paediatric Safety Study Group”.

Bilastine 10 mg had a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of placebo in children aged 2 to <12 years with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or chronic urticaria.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Biomarcadores urticaria

Humanistic Burden of Refractory and Nonrefractory Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria: A Real-World Study in the United States

By Selected articles
Hoskin B, Ortiz B, Paknis B, Kavati A.

Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a debilitating skin condition that can profoundly affect patients’ quality of life. This study explored the impact of refractory and nonrefractory CIU on patients in the real-world setting in the United States.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Bilastina en Asia Pacífico

Selecting optimal second‑generation antihistamines for allergic rhinitis and urticaria in Asia

By Articles about Bilastine
Marysia Tiongco Recto, Ma. Teresita Gabriel, Kanokvalai Kulthanan, Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn, Derrick Chen‑Wee Aw, Tak Hong Lee, Ch’ng Chin Chwen, Somasundran Mutusamy, Nguyen Trong Hao, Vo Thanh Quang and Giorgio Walter Canonica

Background: Allergic diseases are on the rise in many parts of the world, including the Asia–Pacifc (APAC) region.
Second-generation antihistamines are the frst-line treatment option in the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. International guidelines describe the management of these conditions; however, clinicians perceive the additional need to tailor treatment according to patient profles. This study serves as a consensus of experts from several countries in APAC (Hong Kong, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam), which aims to describe the unmet needs, practical considerations, challenges, and key decision factors when determining optimal secondgeneration antihistamines for patients with allergic rhinitis and/or urticaria.
Methods: Specialists from allergology, dermatology, and otorhinolaryngology were surveyed on practical considerations and key decision points when treating patients with allergic rhinitis and/or urticaria.
Results: Clinicians felt the need for additional tools for diagnosis of these diseases and a single drug with all preferred features of an antihistamine. Challenges in treatment include lack of clinician and patient awareness and compliance, fnancial constraints, and treatment for special patient populations such as those with concomitant disease. Selection of optimal second-generation antihistamines depends on many factors, particularly drug safety and efcacy, impact on psychomotor abilities, and sedation. Country-specifc considerations include drug availability and cost-efectiveness. Survey results reveal bilastine as a preferred choice due to its high efcacy and safety, suitability for special patient populations, and the lack of sedative efects.
Conclusions: Compliance to the international guidelines is present among allergists, dermatologists and otorhinolaryngologists; however, this is lower amongst general practitioners (GPs). To increase awareness, allergy education programs targeted at GPs and patients may be benefcial. Updates to the existing international guidelines are suggested in APAC to refect appropriate management for diferent patient profles and varying symptoms of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.
Keywords: Allergic rhinitis, Antihistamines, Bilastine, Treatment algorithm, Urticaria.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login

Efficacy and safety of bilastine in Japanese patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

By Articles about Bilastine
Michihiro Hide (a), Akiko Yagami (b), Michinori Togawa (c), Akihiro Saito (c), Masutaka Furue (d)
(a) Department of Dermatology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
(b) Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
(c) Clinical Development Division, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
(d) Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Background: Bilastine, a novel non-sedating second-generation H1-antihistamine, has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria with a recommended dose of 20 mg once daily in most European countries since 2010. We evaluated its efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II/III study (trial registration No. JapicCTI-142574). Patients (age, 18e74 years) were randomly assigned to receive bilastine 20 mg, 10 mg or placebo once daily for 2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (Day 3 to 0) in total symptom score (TSS) at 2 weeks (Day 8e14), consisting of the itch and rash scores.
Results: A total of 304 patients were randomly allocated to bilastine 20 mg (101 patients), bilastine 10 mg (100 patients), and placebo (103 patients). The changes in TSS at 2 weeks were significantly decreased by bilastine 20 mg than did placebo (p < 0.001), demonstrating the superiority of bilastine 20 mg. Bilastine 10 mg also showed a significant difference from placebo (p < 0.001). The TSS changes for the bilastine showed significant improvement from Day 1, and were maintained during the treatment period. The Dermatology Life Quality Index scores were also improved in bilastine than in placebo. The bilastine treatments were safe and well tolerated.
Conclusions: Two-week treatment with bilastine (20 or 10 mg) once daily was effective and tolerable in Japanese patients with CSU, demonstrating an early onset of action. Read More

Investigación clínica sobre bilastina

Bilastine: A novel antihistamine

By Articles about Bilastine
Jeet Gandhi (1), Kiran Godse (2), Gauri Godse (3),
(1) Consultant Dermatologist, Sakhiya Skin Clinic, Surat, Gujarat, India
(2) Professor of Dermatology, D Y Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
(3) Shree Skin Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Bilastine is a new second generation H1‐antihistamine approved for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria (CU) in patients older than 12 years of age. AR and urticaria are very common clinical conditions that represent one of the most frequent reasons for a patient to visit their general practitioner or allergist or dermatologist. Bilastine, with its efficacy and safety profile epitomizes the evolution of research on antihistamines.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Guías médicas de urticaria crónica

Chronic Urticaria: Comparisons of US, European, and Asian Guidelines

By Selected articles
Maurer M, Zuberbier T, Siebenhaar F, Krause K.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic urticaria is a common dermatological condition that has significant impact on quality of life. Multiple international societies have published guidelines, and although these guidelines generally agree on the definition of urticaria, as well as approach to diagnosis and management, there have been notable differences to date. These differences have been reconciled by the recent publication of the 2017 revision and update published by the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO.

RECENT FINDINGS: The 2017 revision and update to the guidelines for chronic urticaria are the most comprehensive consensus document to date, and reconcile previously existing differences between the US, European, and Asian guidelines. The purpose of our review is to present basic background on urticaria and discuss classification, diagnosis, and most importantly, management. We present differences from previous US, European, and Asian guidelines and reconcile the previous differences by summarizing the 2017 revision and update published by the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO.

This document is only available for registered healthcare professionals

Login
Close Menu

La información que está a punto de visualizar está dirigida únicamente a los profesionales sanitarios aptos para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos. La correcta utilización de su contenido requiere de formación como profesional sanitario.

Debe hacer clic en Aceptar para confirmar que es usted profesional de la salud y continuar con la navegación.

ACEPTAR